Free Online Circuit Simulator!
Posts…
Blogs I Follow
- Hiking Photography
- Social Behavioral Patterns--How to Understand Culture and Behaviors
- Being Rebekah
- Psittacismes
- Canadian Hiking Photography
- TexasReadyBlog
- Kimberly A. Vogel
- Cristian Mihai
- Tommy Lasorda's World
- celtic straits
- clotildajamcracker
- One Movie, Five Views
- Lola's Curmudgeonly Musings on Life, Love & Other Trifles
- Earthpages.ca
- A Business Guy's Guise
- Gentlemen of Sport
- PhotoBotos.com
Blogroll
Tags
Albert Einstein
Android
Antennas
Art
artisan
Atlas Shrugged
atoms
Ayn Rand
Barack Obama
Bible
Business
Christianity
Craft
Design
Einstein
Electronics and Electrical
Engineering
Faith
Garlic
God
History
Idolatry
Jesus
John Wycliffe
Love
matter
metaphor
mitt romney
myth
Mythology
Objectivism
Olive oil
philosophy
Physics
props
PTCRB
reality
religion
Religion and Spirituality
science
telemarketing
theology
truth
United States
wireless
I’m not on expert on Emerson (other than to know that he was a Transcendentalist), but if he really made that statement then I wonder why people even read him?
To the extent that your words are misunderstood, to THAT extent they’re pointless.
Oh, I know: Because the NEXT day he contradicted himself and said that consistency DOES matter! Kinda like saying “This is a lie.”
What a joker…a humorist AND a philosopher.
Transcendentalism doesn’t require invoking Rand to refute — plenty of sensible counters both before and after — long before Rand and without the other “stuff” in her philosophy.
Mark, my friend, thanks for checking in. That quote is from “Self Reliance.”
Rather than using one PoV refute the another, I am thinking that points of view are metaphoric facets refracting the light of something larger. What that larger something is, I do not believe anyone can say, exactly.